Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 04:10

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What defines the k'vanna of the Book of בראשית?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
US Inflation to Tick Higher as Tariffs Reach Consumers - Bloomberg
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Rents fall in most U.S. metros since 2023 as demand struggles to keep up with supply - Seeking Alpha
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why are people with Asperger syndrome unenthusiastic?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What is the reason for The Acolyte (2024 series) having poor reception among Star Wars fans?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
2025 Audi Q5 And SQ5 Are Pretty, Pretty Good - Jalopnik
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Texas woman dies from brain-eating amoeba after clearing sinuses with tap water - Dallas News